Despite rapid advances in large language models, this study shows that human expertise remains critical for producing rigorous systematic reviews, with AI best suited as a supervised support tool ...

An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will evaluate the current standards for high-quality systematic reviews for comparative effectiveness research and ...

Living systematic reviews continuously integrate new research and can provide timely evidence for policy and practice. This format adds value beyond traditional systematic reviews, and we recommend ...

The review analyzed data from seven databases, assessed review quality with ROBIS, calculated pooled AI performance estimates, and identified research gaps through an Evidence Gap Map. AI shows strong ...

Objective To evaluate systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of exercise on general cognition, memory and executive function across all populations and ages. Methods ...